|
|
|
|
||||||||||
| The Local Cube Information Center |
www.cubeslice.com |
||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||
Differences between CubeSlice Relational ASSL and CubeSlice OLAP ASSL
CubeSlice uses two forms of ASSL (Analysis Services Scripting
Language) to create local cubes.
The two forms of ASSL created with CubeSlice are very similar. Here
are the main differences:
• Permissions to access the Analysis Server and the source relational
server. • CubeSlice Relational ASSL is fully supported only when the source relational database is Microsoft SQL Server. When you are using other relational data sources some features, such as member slicing, are not supported with Relational ASSL. 2. When creating local cubes with CubeSlice Relational ASSL you have the option of removing unused dimension members, which can greatly decrease the size of your local cubes and the time needed to create them.
3. When creating local cubes with CubeSlice OLAP ASSL, you have the
option of changing the key attribute of each dimension. This also
greatly decreases the size of your local cubes and the time needed to
create them. 6. The creation of a local cube from a server cube containing linked dimensions or linked measure groups is supported by the CubeSlice OLAP ASSL. It is not, at the present time, supported when using CubeSlice Relational ASSL.
7. More cubes can be successfully created with slicing when using
CubeSlice Relational ASSL. Local cube creation with CubeSlice OLAP
ASSL can fail when slicing on the time dimension, if there is also a
semi-additive measure included in the local cube. Slicing can also
cause local cube creation to fail when a many-to-many dimension is
included in the local cube. CubeSlice Relational ASSL does not have
these problems. |
|||||||||||||